Jayasena v. Punchiappuhamy and Another – sllr 1980 volume 2 page 043

In the case between Jayasena (Plaintiff) and Āpunchiappuhamy and another (Defendants, including representatives of the State Gem Corporation), the court addressed whether the revocation of the plaintiff’s one-year gem prospecting licence—without affording an opportunity to be heard—violated principles of natural justice. It was determined that such revocation, affecting a pre-existing and vested right, required adherence to natural justice. Relief was granted, quashing the order cancelling the licence and directing an extension for the unexpired period, reaffirming the principle that deprivation of vested rights by administrative acts is subject to judicial review and the requirements of fair procedure. This decision relied on precedents such as Fernandopulle v. Minister of Lands and McInn