Rasheed Ali v. Mohamed Ali and Others – sllr 1981 volume 2 page 029

The case between Mohamed Haniffa Rasheed Ali (Petitioner) and Khan Mohamed Ali (1st Respondent), among others, addressed the issue of whether an application for revision of a District Court’s order in execution proceedings could be entertained where the petitioner failed to comply with procedural requirements under Rule 46 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1978. It was held that strict compliance with Rule 46 is essential, and failure to promptly remedy any non-compliance precludes relief, regardless of the urgency claimed by the petitioner. The findings established that the petitioner had not produced sufficient or credible evidence to substantiate claims of tenancy or subtenancy, and that such claims were not made bona fide. The court reaffirmed the principle that procedural rules in execution