Kamil Hassan v. Fairline Garments (International) Ltd. and Two Others – sllr 1990 volume 1 page 394

In the case between Kamil Hassan (plaintiff) and Fairline Garments (International) Ltd. and others (defendants), the court examined issues relating to the termination of employment and compliance with an order of reinstatement under the Termination of Employment of Workmen (Special Provisions) Act. The proceedings addressed the employer’s adherence to a Commissioner’s order for reinstatement and payment of back wages and benefits. Disputes arose regarding whether these directives, including the grant of benefits, were satisfied, and if any failure amounted to contempt of court. It was determined that wilful non-compliance by the employer had not been proven on the evidence, and thus, the rule nisi for contempt was refused. The judgment clarified the distinction between judicial review and