Peiris and Another v. Perera and Another – sllr 2002 volume 2 page 128

In the case between Peiris and Another (Plaintiffs) and Perera and Another (Defendants), the court examined whether the District Court had jurisdiction under sections 662 and 664(1) of the Civil Procedure Code and section 54(1) of the Judicature Act to grant a mandatory injunction, particularly in circumstances involving the prompt removal of an obstruction that affected property access. The findings established that mandatory injunctions can be issued to restore the status quo when a positive act, such as demolition, is required due to rapid or recent changes that threaten to undermine the effectiveness of injunctive relief. Reliance was placed on judicial precedents, including Redland Bricks Ltd. v. Morris, reinforcing the principle that interim and mandatory injunctions are permissible