In Re the Nineteenth Amendment To the Constitution… – sllr 2002 volume 3 page 085

Brief
The case between twenty-four Petitioners—including various individuals challenging the proposed Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution—and the State, addressed whether certain amendments to constitutional provisions governing the dissolution of Parliament, the appointment of the Prime Minister, and related matters amounted to an unconstitutional alienation or removal of executive and legislative power. It was determined that amendments affecting Articles 70, 43, 49, and 99 transferred powers in ways inconsistent with Articles 3 and 4 of the Constitution, thereby requiring passage by a special majority under Article 84(2) as well as approval by the People at a referendum under Article 83. Key legal principles regarding the inalienability of sovereignty, the separation of powers, and