R.F. De Mel and Another v. Imaduwa, Labour Officer and Another – sllr 2003 volume 1 page 308

In the case between R. F. De Mel and Another (the employer) and Imaduwa, Labour Officer and Another (the workman and associated authorities), the court addressed the issue of compliance with a Labour Tribunal settlement order mandating reinstatement and payment of back wages. It was held that the employer had deliberately failed to comply with the terms of the settlement order, specifically through actions that delayed or circumvented reinstatement despite the clear obligation outlined in the order. The decision reaffirmed the principle that strict adherence to Labour Tribunal orders is essential and cannot be evaded by imposing additional terms or through unilateral pecuniary settlements. The court relied on established authorities concerning the enforceability of labour awards and the pr