Sudu Aiya and Others vs The Attorney-General – sllr 2005 volume 1 page 358

In Sudu Aiya and Others v. The Attorney-General, the court addressed the issue of whether convictions and a death sentence for conspiracy to commit murder, murder, and abetment of murder were supported by admissible and sufficient evidence. It was held that the prosecution’s case was proven beyond reasonable doubt, affirming that accomplice testimony, where adequately corroborated by independent and circumstantial evidence, can sustain a conviction. This decision relied on established criminal law principles requiring corroboration of accomplice evidence and the standard of proof in criminal cases, underscoring that such corroboration was present through various independent sources and circumstances, thereby justifying the convictions and sentences.

Hector Yapa J. — Upon examination of t