Dennise Perera vs Baur & Company Ltd. – sllr 2005 volume 2 page 328

In the case between Densalse Perera (Plaintiff-appellant) and Baur & Company Ltd. (Defendant-respondent), the court addressed whether a mandatory injunction could be issued at an interim stage compelling the defendant to obtain and recommend entry passes for the plaintiff, and whether such interim mandatory orders could precede a final determination of the action. It was held that interim mandatory injunctions of this nature are generally inappropriate prior to final judgment, reaffirming the principle that mandatory reliefs requiring affirmative acts from defendants must only be granted after substantive legal issues have been decided. This approach was supported by reliance on precedents including Peiris vs. Perera, Tudor vs. Anulawathie, and Puranik vs. Travotal India Pvt. Ltd., and emp