Dharma Wan Sa vs. People’s Bank and Another – sllr 2006 volume 3 page 045
In the case between Dharma Wan Sa (appellant/defendant-petitioner) and People’s Bank and another (respondent bank), the court addressed the issue of whether the execution of a decree nisi made absolute is automatically stayed upon the filing of an appeal, and the correct interpretation of the three-year validity period set out in the Debt Recovery (Special Provisions) Act. It was held that a decree nisi made absolute operates as a writ of execution that is not stayed by an appeal, and the three-year period applies solely to the validity of the writ of execution, not the decree itself. The court reaffirmed that reissuance of the writ is permissible and that compliance with procedural requirements around execution is essential. This decision relied on statutory interpretation of sections 5,

