The Director General, Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption vs Kalinga Padmatillake – SC APPEAL NO. 99/2007-2009

In the case between the Director General, Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (Complainant/Respondent) and Kalinga Padmatillake, alias Sergeant Elpitiya (Accused/Appellant/Petitioner), the Supreme Court addressed the validity of convictions and sentences imposed for bribery offenses, focusing on alleged evidentiary inconsistencies and the adequacy of the assessment of prosecution witness testimony. It was determined that the evidence presented contained notable contradictions and that unreliable or hearsay evidence had been improperly accepted, contrary to the applicable standard of proof—beyond reasonable doubt—in criminal proceedings. Prior findings of the Magistrate’s Court and subsequent dismissal by the High Court were found to be unsupported by a coherent e

REF: SC APPEAL NO. 99/2007-2009 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top