Punchi Manike vs. Jayarthne – SC APPEAL 103/2009-2009

In the case between the substituted plaintiff respondents, including the representatives of R. M. Punchi Manike (deceased), and the defendant/appellant, G. G. Jayarthne, the court addressed the issue of lawful possession and identification of specific premises, particularly distinguishing among boutique rooms (Nos. 130C, 130D, 130E) and store rooms (Nos. 130A, 130B). The proceedings examined the sufficiency of evidence regarding possession and ownership, including documentary proof of title, evidence of construction expenditure, and administrative payments, alongside the admissibility of new legal issues raised at the appellate stage concerning the termination of a leave and license arrangement. It was held that the defendant failed to establish lawful possession in the face of more credib

REF: SC APPEAL 103/2009-2009 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top