Aluthgama Hewage Ariyapala Amaradasa vs Hewaralalage Dulani Dilrukshi – SC APPEAL 108/2019-2022
In the case between Aluthgama Hewage Ariyapala Amaradasa (and Gamlath Ralalage Chandrawathie, as substituted) and Hewaralalage Dulani Dilrukshi, the court addressed the interpretation of evidence concerning two distinct transactions — a cash loan for house construction and the handling of jewellery. It was held that the High Court of Civil Appeal erred in its assessment of the evidentiary connection between the documents relied upon and the transactions in question, and that no logical or evidentiary basis existed to treat the jewellery as security for the monetary loan. The District Court judgment in favor of the plaintiff was restored, affirming that the evidentiary standard set by the plaintiff was met. The decision relied on careful scrutiny of the documentary evidence and prior proce

