Wadumestrige Nimal vs Wadumestrige Wilson – SC/Appeal/51/2020 -2025
The Court addressed the issue of the partition of the land known as “Thotewatte.” The case examined the original ownership and entitlement to shares of the Corpus, with particular focus on 2/24 and 22/24 shares, alongside the validity and sufficiency of pedigree and inheritance evidence. The findings established that questions of oral and documentary evidence were critical in determining whether certain parties were rightful co-owners or licensees. It was held that the evidence did not favor the plaintiff’s claims, and the appeal was dismissed, thereby affirming the judgments of the Additional District Judge and the High Court. The holding reaffirmed the principle that the burden lies on parties asserting ownership in partition actions to clearly prove their title by credible evidence. Thi

