W.P. Ranasinghe vs Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Siriyawathi – CA PHC 142/2006-2013

In the case between W.P. Ranasinghe (Appellant) and Rathnayake Mudiyanselage Siriyawathi (Respondent), the court examined whether the appeal could proceed in light of procedural deficiencies, including the absence of the appellant and non-payment of brief fees. It was determined that notice to the appellant could not be effected due to the address issue, and the required brief fees had not been paid. The appeal was consequently rejected on the basis of procedural non-compliance, reaffirming that strict adherence to procedural requirements is necessary for the continuation of appellate proceedings. Reliance was placed on the obligation of appellants to comply with court directions and established civil procedure, underscoring the requirement for proper notice and payment of necessary fees f