P.G. Jayathilake Perera vs Urban Development Authority – CA PHC NO. 208/2006-2013

The case between P.G. Jayathilake Perera (Appellant) and the Urban Development Authority (Respondent) addressed whether the appeal could proceed in light of procedural non-compliance, specifically concerning absence, refusal of notice, and non-payment of brief fees. It was determined that the appeal was rejected due to the appellant’s failure to appear, refusal to accept process, and non-compliance with statutory requirements for fee payment. The decision reaffirmed the principle that strict adherence to procedural rules is essential for the continuation of an appeal, referencing procedural statutes governing court process and fee payment. As a result, appeals may be dismissed where there is procedural default and non-compliance with court-issued requirements.

A.W.A. Salam J. — The findi