S.N.K. Gunasoma et al. vs National Gem & Jewellery Authority et al. – CA WRIT APPLICATION NO. 571/2011-2013

In the case between S.N.K. Gunasoma and others (Petitioners) and S.N.K. Heen Menmenike alias Chandra Narayana and others (Respondents), the court addressed the issue of whether the decision of the 3rd Respondent, R.P. Malani Rajapaksha, directing that a gem mining licence be issued to the 5th Respondent, J.M.M. Sumendra Tissa Kumara, should be quashed by writ of certiorari. The court held that the 3rd Respondent’s administrative decision stood on essential factual and legal grounds, and found no irregularity or error in its issuance, reaffirming the principle that administrative discretion in licensing is sustainable if supported by available evidence and pending civil contests do not preclude such action. This decision relied on the assessment of title records, relevant documentary and or