Edirimunige Sriyani Perera and U.P.A. Padmathilaka vs Upul Menuwara and R.M. Ranasinghe – CA PHC NO. 205/2006-2013

In the case between Edirimunige Sriyani Perera & U.P.A. Padmathilaka and Upul Menuwara & R.M. Ranasinghe, the court addressed the issue of whether an appeal should proceed in circumstances where the appellant failed to comply with a court order to deposit brief fees. It was held that the non-compliance with the requirement to deposit brief fees, after notice was properly issued, warranted rejection of the appeal. The principle affirmed that strict adherence to procedural requirements, such as payment of brief fees, is essential for the continuation of appellate proceedings. Reliance was placed on procedural court rules, with emphasis on the importance of compliance in maintaining the orderly administration of justice.

A.W.A. SALAM, J. — The findings established that the appellants were a