H.Y. Sunil vs Mithrasena Wickramage – CA PHC NO. 266/2006-2013

In the case between H.Y. Sunil (Appellant) and Mithrasena Wickramage, National Water Board (Respondent), the court addressed whether the appeal could be permitted to proceed in view of the appellant’s non-payment of the required brief fees. It was determined that failure to comply with the mandatory directive for the deposit of brief fees justified rejection of the appeal. The holding reaffirmed the principle that appellate procedure and payment requirements stipulated in court notices are mandatory, and non-compliance leads to dismissal. Reliance was placed on established appellate procedure, underscoring that strict adherence to procedural obligations remains essential for the continuation of appellate proceedings.

A.W.A. Salam J. — The evidence established that the appellant, after be