W.D. Jestin Francis Perera vs D.R. Ranathunga – CA PHC NO. 293/06-2013

The case between W.D. Jestin Francis Perera (Appellant) and D.R. Ranathunga (Respondent) addressed the procedural issue regarding continuation of an appeal in light of the appellant’s failure to pay mandatory brief fees. It was held that the appeal must be rejected due to non-compliance with the requirement to pay brief fees, reaffirming the principle that strict adherence to procedural rules—including payment obligations—is essential for the advancement of appeals. The decision was based on the necessity for compliance with court-mandated procedural requirements and highlighted that non-payment of requisite fees results in summary rejection of appeals.

A.W.A. Salam J. — The findings established that the appellant was duly notified but failed to pay the required brief fees within the sti