R. Somapala Rajapaksha vs Mohomed Shariff Mohomed Musthafa – CA PHC NO.313/06-2013

In the case between R. Somapala Rajapaksha and Mohomed Shariff Mohomed Musthafa, Acting Registrar, University of Peradeniya, the court addressed whether an appeal could be maintained despite the appellant’s procedural defaults, specifically failing to provide an updated address and neglecting to deposit brief fees as required by court rules. It was held that procedural compliance with court requirements is essential, and the appeal was dismissed for failure to fulfill these obligations. This decision reaffirmed the principle that adherence to procedural rules, including notification of address change and timely fee payment, is critical to the continuation of appellate proceedings. Reliance was placed on the relevant court procedural requirements, underscoring the consequence that procedura