A.A. Guarathne vs A.A. Amararathne – CA 882/98 F-2013

In the dispute between A.A. Guarathne (Appellant) and A.A. Amararathne (Respondent), along with other parties, the Court addressed the allocation of land shares in a partition action. The issue focused on correcting errors in the initial assignment of fractional shares to various parties, as the existing share allocation exceeded the legal entirety and contained ambiguities regarding a specific allotment. It was determined that the disputed allocation, including the additional 9/32 shares to the 2nd Defendant and vagueness in the description of 12 perches allocated to the 9th Defendant, was incorrect. The matter was settled upon consensus among the parties, resulting in a Court-ordered correction of the share allocation. The District Judge was accordingly directed to enter an interlocutory