S. Upul Priyantha Senanayake vs OIC Police Station, Ragama – CA PHC NO. 130/2007-2013

In S. Upul Priyantha Senanayake v. Officer-in-Charge, Police Station, Ragama and Hon. Attorney General, the court addressed the issue of whether an appeal could proceed when the appellant failed to comply with procedural requirements, specifically the failure to deposit brief fees as notified by the court. It was held that non-compliance with the court’s directive constituted grounds for rejection of the appeal, reaffirming that strict adherence to procedural rules is mandatory for the continuation of appeals. This determination was grounded in procedural law governing appeals, underscoring the importance of compliance with orders issued by the court and reinforcing the necessity of prompt procedural fulfillment by litigants.

A.W.A.Salam J. — The findings established that the appellant w