Hapanthilakage Kiribabee and Gunaramage Nandawathie vs Kadanhena Durage Meisa and 10 others – CA 569/96-2011
In the dispute between Hapanthilakage Kiribabee and Gunaramage Nandawathie (Plaintiff-Appellants) and Kadanhena Durage Meisa and others (Defendants), the court addressed the issue of whether the dismissal of a partition action regarding the land “Meegahawatte” was appropriate, focusing on title acquisition through deeds and prescription. It was held that the District Court had not erred in evaluating the evidence or in accepting the first defendant’s claim to title. The principle reaffirmed in this decision is that appellate intervention is unwarranted when the trial court’s judgment is supported by cogent reasoning and proper evidentiary assessment. The outcome relied on a comprehensive review of the trial evidence and parties’ claims, emphasizing the necessity for appellants to substanti

