W. Jane Nona Kumbuka, Gonapola et al. vs H. D. Chalo Singho, Maha Uduwa et al. – CA NO.499/98 F -2013

In the case between l.W. Jane Nona Kumbuka, W. Wijerathna, K. Kusumawathie, W. Dayawansa, among others, and D. Surabiel and others, the Court addressed whether the failure to substitute legal representatives for deceased defendants during a partition action in the District Court voids the judgment and necessitates a re-trial. It was held that such omission does not invalidate the judgment, reaffirming the principle that statutory finality under Section 81(9) of the Partition Law No. 21 of 1977 overrides procedural defects relating to non-substitution. The reasoning relied on the express language of the amended Partition Law, emphasizing that partition decrees retain their finality and bind heirs or representatives, even when substitution of deceased parties has not occurred. The Supreme Co

REF: CA NO.499/98 F -2013 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top