S.P. Saiman vs Hon. Attorney General – CA NO.295/2012-2013

In the case between S.P. Saiman (Appellant) and the Hon. Attorney General (Respondent), the court addressed the issue of whether the conviction and sentence of the appellant by the High Court of Nuwara Eliya should be set aside or varied on appeal. It was determined that, upon the appellant’s request to withdraw the appeal, the application for withdrawal was allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court were therefore affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed. The holding reaffirms the principle that a voluntarily withdrawn appeal leaves the original judgment undisturbed. This outcome was based on the appellant’s express application and the court’s acceptance of such, emphasizing the finality of decisions when an appeal is withdrawn by the appellant.

Sisira de Abrew J. — It