Rajeswari Nadarajah vs Hon. Bandula Gunawardena et al. – CA WRIT APPLICATION NO. 403/2008-2014

In the case between Rajeswari Nadarajah (Petitioner) and Bandula Gunawardena, Mahipala Herath, A.P.G. Kithsiri, Sunil Premachandra, and Yatiyanthota Multipurpose Co-operative Societies Limited (Respondents), the court addressed whether writs of mandamus should be issued to compel de-requisition and return of property owned by the petitioner, and whether the existence of a private tenancy agreement and delay in seeking relief preclude such remedy. It was held that the existence of a valid tenancy agreement and unexplained delay barred the issuance of a writ, reaffirming the principle that writ remedies are discretionary and unavailable where alternative adequate legal remedies exist. Reliance was placed on statutory provisions governing writs and legal authorities emphasizing the inappropri

REF: CA WRIT APPLICATION NO. 403/2008-2014 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top