Ediriweera Gamage Matheshamy vs Ediriweera Gamage Babynona – CA REVISION APPLICATION NO: 874/2004-2011

In the case between Ediriweera Gamage Matheshamy (Plaintiff) and Ediriweera Gamage Babynona, Padma Alexander Hettiarachchi, Kaluthanthiri Arachchige Premawathi, among others (Defendants), the court addressed whether the District Judge’s order partitioning the land according to Plan No. 6112A should be revised. The findings established that the District Judge had adequately considered all objections concerning the allocation of parcels, including the placement of a lavatory and the fair distribution of road frontage. It was determined that the amalgamation of lots remedied the main objections of the parties and that the trial judge’s order reflected a thorough evaluation of factual issues, leaving no grounds for appellate interference. This holding reaffirmed the principle that appellate ju