Kurugama Gunathilaka vs Southern Development Authority et al. – CA WRIT/78/2013-2013

The case between Kurugama Gunathilaka (Petitioner) and the Southern Development Authority with associated officials (Respondents) addressed the issue of the validity and procedural fairness of disciplinary proceedings resulting in the petitioner’s removal from an acting post and the deferral of salary increments. It was held that the disciplinary process failed to comply with the requirements of natural justice and the applicable Administrative Code; in particular, the summary inquiry lacked proper notice of charges, procedural safeguards, and a validly constituted disciplinary committee. The holding reaffirmed the principle that affected parties are entitled to advance notice of charges and a fair hearing in disciplinary matters, and that strict compliance with the Administrative Code and