Horathala v. 4th Respondent – 42/2012-2009

In the case between Rajapaksha Pedige Sunil Santha (Petitioner) and the Divisional Secretary, Giribawa & Others (Respondents), the issues addressed included the legality of nominating and registering Upul Seneviratne as successor to lands originally granted under the Land Development Ordinance (LDO), compliance with statutory requirements concerning blood relationship, and observance of natural justice. It was held that the process of registering the 4th Respondent as grantee was ultra vires, as statutory authorities failed to properly investigate objections or establish a proper inquiry regarding paternity and legal eligibility under the LDO. The holding reaffirmed that succession nominations under the LDO must adhere strictly to blood relationship requirements and due process, with empha