Mohamad Faizer Mohamad Liyakath et al. vs The Hon. Attorney General – 230-235/2013-2013

In the case between Mohamad Faizer Mohamad Liyakath and others (Accused-Appellants) and the Hon. Attorney General (Complainant-Respondent), the court addressed the issue of whether the conviction of the accused for unlawful assembly, murder, and related offenses was proper, given alleged defects in witness credibility, identification, and evidentiary consistency. It was held that the evidence of the prosecution, particularly from key eyewitnesses, was reliable and corroborated, and that the identification process and assessment of contradictions did not prejudice the accused. The principle reaffirmed is that credibility and sufficiency of identification are matters of judicial evaluation, especially where the parties are familiar and dock identification is substantiated. This decision reli