Indikadulla Kankanamge Siriyawathie vs Kasthuri Arachchilage Rosalin – CA PHC/228/2006-2017
In the case between Indikadulla Kankanamge Siriyawathie and Kasthuri Arachchilage Rosalin, the court considered whether the Provincial High Court had erred in affirming the Primary Court’s award of possession of land to the 1st Respondent and examined the grounds for appellate interference. The Primary Court had granted possession of land to the 1st Respondent based on evidence, a decision subsequently affirmed by the Provincial High Court. The Court of Appeal evaluated whether any legal error, impropriety, or exceptional circumstances existed to warrant appellate intervention and upheld the prior orders. The judgment reaffirmed the legal principle that orders of the Primary Court under the Primary Courts Procedure Act function in a preventive and provisional capacity and may only be chall

