Dr. H.R.K.K. Karunadasa vs University of Ruhuna et al. – CA WRIT 93/2012-2012

In Dr. H.R.K.K. Karunadasa v. University of Ruhuna and others, the court addressed the propriety of issuing a writ of certiorari to quash the University Council’s decision exonerating the 25th respondent from disciplinary charges, and a writ of mandamus to compel initiation of disciplinary proceedings. It was held that the application could not be maintained as the petitioner, not being currently attached to the University, failed to establish a personal legal grievance arising from the decision. Additionally, the challenge was brought after an undue delay exceeding a decade. The principle reaffirmed is that judicial intervention by way of writ will not be granted where there is no direct legal injury and where the application is inordinate and unexplained in its delay. This determination