Muniyandi Kandasami v. Hon. Attorney General – CA 56/2011-2011

In the case between Muniyandi Kandasami (Accused-Appellant) and the Hon. Attorney General (Respondent/State/Prosecution), the court addressed whether the conviction and death sentence imposed for the murder of Velaudan Mailwaganam should be set aside on appeal. It was determined that there was no basis to interfere with the findings and sentence of the High Court, as counsel for the appellant admitted no grounds existed to contest the conviction. The decision reaffirmed the principle that an appellate court will not disturb the findings of fact or conviction by a trial court when evidence is corroborated and uncontested. Reliance was placed upon the consistency of eyewitness and medical testimony, emphasizing that appeals lacking substantive grounds for challenge will be dismissed.

Sisira