Pattiyagedara Mohottalalage Dayarathna Bandara vs. Gunadasa Amarasekara – CA PHC 178/2009-2012

In the case between Pattiyagedara Mohottalalage Dayarathna Bandara (Appellant) and Gunadasa Amarasekara (Respondent), the Court addressed whether the learned High Court Judge erred in refusing to overturn the order of the Magistrate dated 02.08.2007 and whether the Appellant had suppressed material facts by failing to provide essential records and exhibits, specifically photographs of disputed land, in the revision application before the High Court. The Appellant’s omission of relevant documents and evidence was determined to constitute suppression of material facts, violating Rule 46 of the Supreme Court Rules. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the requirement that all material facts and documents must be disclosed in applications for relief under the Supreme Cou