Mohomad Kalif Mohomad Nazeer Alias Nadeer vs The Attorney General – CA HCC/0096/2020-2022

In the case between Mohomad Kalif Mohomad Nazeer alias Nadeer (Accused-Appellant) and the Attorney General (Respondent), the court addressed whether the evidence, particularly the testimony of the minor victim corroborated by medical opinion, was credible and sufficient to sustain convictions for abduction and rape. It was held that the minor omissions in the victim’s testimony did not go to the root of the case and that the requirements under Section 363 (e) of the Penal Code regarding the proof of rape were satisfied. The decision reaffirmed that credible evidence from a victim, even with some minor omissions due to trauma or passage of time, is sufficient if corroborated by medical and witness testimony. Established legal precedents around corroboration and evidentiary standards in sexu