Aysha Hameed and others Vs. Mohomed Mohideen Shaul Hameed and others – CPA 13/2021-2020

In the case between Mohomed Mohideen Shaul Hameed, Shaul Mohomed Mohideen Shabin, and Mohamed Shahim Shahul Hameed (Petitioners) and Aysha Hameed and M. Rushdi Nisar (Respondents), the court addressed the issue of whether a revision application challenging the orders of the Magistrate and the High Court Judge should be allowed. It was held that the extraordinary revisionary jurisdiction could not be invoked in the absence of a clear pleading and demonstration of exceptional circumstances, reaffirming the principle that revision is an extraordinary remedy reserved for instances where the interests of justice are gravely affected. This decision was guided by relevant procedural statutes, including the Primary Courts’ Procedure Act, and legal precedents, emphasizing the requirement that only