Fathima Hasna vs Mohamed Yoosuf Ali Akram – CA LTA/0001/2020-2024

In the case between Mohamed Yoosuf Ali Akram and Fathima Hasna, the court addressed the issue of whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Board of Quazis’ order affirming a maintenance decree nisi in favor of the respondent (wife) and the children. It was determined that the objections raised by the petitioner (husband) concerning the inquiry and his income had been properly addressed at the original proceedings, and no substantial procedural irregularity or merit was shown to disturb the orders of the Quazi and the Board of Quazis. The court held that leave to appeal should be refused, reaffirming the principle that appellate interference is unwarranted where the substantive and procedural aspects of the maintenance order have been properly considered. This decision relied on