Mohomed Faris Mohomed Isham vs The Hon. Attorney General – CA HCC/0160/2022-2024

In the case of Mohomed Faris Mohomed Isham (Accused-Appellant) v. The Hon. Attorney General (Complainant-Respondent), the court addressed whether the evidence established grave sexual abuse beyond reasonable doubt under Section 365(B)(2)(b) of the Penal Code, the sufficiency of the charge’s particulars, the credibility of witness accounts, and the appropriateness of the sentence. It was held that the trial court’s findings and sentence were justified, reaffirming the principle that a conviction may be sustained where the overall evidentiary basis is credible, despite minor testimonial inconsistencies. This decision relied on Sections 164 and 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant judicial precedents, emphasizing the sufficiency of material particulars and corroborated testimony