Laugfs Gas PLC vs. Hon. Attorney General – CA/WRIT/182/2024-2024

In the case between Laugfs Gas PLC and its Chairman, W.K.H. Wegapitiya (the petitioners), and the State (represented by the Attorney General, state ministers, Treasury officials, and committee members), the court addressed whether certain tender document clauses—specifically clause 4.5(a) and related sections—were unreasonable, ultra vires, or in violation of administrative law principles. It was determined that participation in the bidding process constituted acquiescence, thereby estopping the petitioners from later challenging the tender terms. The findings established that, under administrative law, legal doctrines of estoppel, waiver, and consent do not extend to acts that are ultra vires, and the court’s review is limited in policy matters designed to promote competition and prevent