Liyana Mudiyanselage Sukhitha Sandamalee Algama vs. Weerakkody Achchilage Ukku Singho – CA/RII/323/2013-2024

The case between Liyana Mudiyanselage (41A defendant-petitioner) and Weerakkody Achchilage Ukku Singho (01A defendant-respondent), along with additional respondents including Weerakkody Achchilage Ganga and Lalani Weerrakkody, addressed the issues arising from a partition action initiated prior to 31.07.1962. The core legal issue concerned an application for Restitutio-in-Integrum and Revision under Article 138 of the Constitution, challenging various interlocutory decrees, scheme inquiry orders, and their amendments related to the apportionment of land among several defendants. It was held that the evidential and technical objections submitted by the 41A defendant-petitioner were insufficient to justify intervention by revision or restitutio-in-integrum. The key principle reaffirmed was t