Abeydeera Arachchige Chalet Kamalawathie vs Galagedara Muthukuda Wickramasinghe Mudiyanselage Karunawathie – CA RII/44/2024-2024

In the case between Abeydeera Arachchige Chalet Kamalawathie (Defendant-Petitioner) and Galagedara Muthukuda Wickramasinghe Mudiyanselage Karunawathie (Respondent/Substituted Plaintiff), the court addressed the issue of proper identification and enforcement of an eviction writ concerning a specific 40×40 feet (1600 sq ft) land plot described in Deed No. 3008 versus claims to a larger inherited parcel by the Defendant-Petitioner. It was held that the Plaintiff’s legal claim is confined to 1600 sq ft and the execution of the writ covering a larger area was improper. The principle reaffirmed is that writs for possession must be enforced only with precise boundary identification, as supported by proper surveying and boundary verification. The decision was grounded in procedural requirements fo