Articles

Bigamy & Void Marriages in Sri Lanka

Bigamy & Void Marriages in Sri Lanka: When Second Marriage is Invalid

An Analysis of SC Appeal No. 211/2012: Bigamy & Void Marriages. The Integrity of Matrimonial Law. Case Title: Udagepolage Gunasiri Seneviratne vs Pattiya Widanage Carmen PremalathaCourt : Supreme Court of Sri Lanka | SC APPEAL 211/2012Before: Priyasath Dep P.C., J., Priyantha Jayawardena P.C., J & Anil Gooneratne J. Introduction The decision of the Supreme Court of Sri […]

Bigamy & Void Marriages in Sri Lanka: When Second Marriage is Invalid Read More »

Understanding Issue Estoppel in Evidence Law

Understanding Issue Estoppel in Evidence Law | Application – Criminal Law – Civil Law

Associated with the doctrines of law pertaining to estoppel and res judicata, is another doctrine referred to as ‘issue estoppel’. Spencer Bower and Handley on “Res Judicata” states that, “ a decision (a reference to the final judicial decision contained in a previous case) will create an issue estoppel, if it is determined as an issue in a cause of

Understanding Issue Estoppel in Evidence Law | Application – Criminal Law – Civil Law Read More »

Clarence Wijewardene Copyright Case

Clarence Wijewardene Copyright Case: Supreme Court Upholds Artists’ Rights

Clarence Wijewardene Copyright Case: The Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, in a landmark judgment delivered on 23 May 2025, reaffirmed the importance of intellectual property rights by ruling in favour of the estate of the late Clarence Wijewardene, one of the country’s most celebrated musicians and composers. The case, brought by his widow Mrs. Sheela

Clarence Wijewardene Copyright Case: Supreme Court Upholds Artists’ Rights Read More »

Boundaries & Co-ownership rights

Boundaries & Rights of co-owners | Case Analysis: Alfred Fernando v. Julian Fernando (1987) 2 Sri LR 78

This important Court of Appeal decision explores the legal parameters of actions for the definition of boundaries – actio finium regundorum – under Sri Lankan law, elucidating the rights of co-owners, the nature of proof required, and the limitations of such actions. It is frequently cited for its comprehensive synthesis of principle and its distinction

Boundaries & Rights of co-owners | Case Analysis: Alfred Fernando v. Julian Fernando (1987) 2 Sri LR 78 Read More »

Custody & Guardianship in Sri Lanka

Child Custody & Guardianship in Sri Lanka: Explore a comparative perspective

Child custody & guardianship in Sri Lanka is one of the most emotionally charged and legally complex aspects of family law. In Sri Lanka, the law around these issues has undergone a gradual transformation – moving away from rigid patriarchal traditions toward a more child-centered approach. But how does Sri Lanka’s system compare to other

Child Custody & Guardianship in Sri Lanka: Explore a comparative perspective Read More »

Can state institutions hide legal fees

Can state institutions hide legal fees? Court says public money must remain open to scrutiny – Right to Information Act Sri Lanka

Title: Sri Lanka Telecom PLC v Right to Information Commission and C. J. WijayawardhanaCase number: CA/RTI/0002/2023Decided on: 2025-07-03Before: Dr. Sumudu Premachandra J.; R. Gurusinghe J. Introduction In another important decision strengthening Sri Lanka’s Right to Information regime, the Court of Appeal ruled that legal expenses incurred by public institutions cannot be hidden from public scrutiny

Can state institutions hide legal fees? Court says public money must remain open to scrutiny – Right to Information Act Sri Lanka Read More »

Child Marriage In Sri Lanka

Child Marriage in Sri Lanka

Introduction Child marriage in Sri Lanka remains a pressing human rights issue, where personal laws and constitutional rights often clash. Despite legal reforms and international pressure, the practice persists, particularly in Muslim communities governed by personal laws that allow underage marriages. This article explores the conflict between personal laws and constitutional rights in Sri Lanka,

Child Marriage in Sri Lanka Read More »

Helping Hambantota Case

Helping Hambantota Case Analysis

Mahinda Rajapakse  v.  Chandra Fernando and others (the Helping Hambantota case) SC(FR) App: No. 387/2005 The Bench comprised Chief Justice, Sarath N. Silva, Justice Shirani Tilakawardena, and Justice N.E. Dissanayake. In this case Mahinda Rajapakse cited Chandra Fernando IGP, Lionel Gunatilake, DIG, P. Ampawila, Inspector of Police, Kabir Hashim, MP, and the Attorney General as

Helping Hambantota Case Analysis Read More »

Scroll to Top