B.P.H. Gamini De Silva vs. The Chairman Pradeshiya Sabawa, Welimada. – CA PHC APN 105/2012-2012

In the case between B.P.H. Gamini De Silva (Petitioner) and The Chairman, Pradeshiya Sabawa, Welimada (Respondent), the court addressed the issue of whether the Magistrate’s order to demolish an unauthorized construction was procedurally defective due to alleged lack of proper service of summons or opportunity to be heard. It was held that, despite the petitioner’s contention, the petitioner had appeared before the court multiple times following the original order and failed to provide an approved plan or show cause regarding the unauthorized structure. The court reaffirmed the principle that mere technicalities regarding summons do not override substantive compliance with procedural fairness when the party has had adequate opportunity to be heard. The decision relied on factual findings a

REF: CA PHC APN 105/2012-2012 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top