Kandurana Pathirannehalage Premasiri vs Matiwala Gamage Vimalawathi – CA PHC NO. 207/2005-2012

The case between Kandurana Pathirannehalage Premasiri and Matiwala Gamage Vimalawathi addressed the issue of whether an appeal should proceed when the appellant was absent, unrepresented, and failed to comply with the court’s directive to pay brief fees in accordance with Rule 13(b) of the Supreme Court. The court held that non-compliance with the order to pay brief fees warranted dismissal of the appeal. This decision reaffirmed the principle that strict adherence to procedural requirements is essential for the continuation of legal proceedings. Reference was made to relevant court rules regarding payment of brief fees, emphasizing that compliance with court orders and procedural rules is fundamental for the administration of justice.

Rohini Marasinghe J. — It was determined that the ap

REF: CA PHC NO. 207/2005-2012 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top