B.G.B. Hairul Mafia vs Abdul Aziz Mohamed Buhary – CA 1147/98 F -2013

In the case between Abdul Aziz Mohamed Buhary, M.A.A. Ramun Beebie (Appellants), and B.G.B. Hairul Mafia, T. Mahuthuma Umma (Respondents), the court addressed the identification of the correct land (corpus) for partition—specifically, whether Plan X or Plan Y was appropriate—and the correct allocation of ownership shares. It was held that Plan X, depicting 89 perches and aligning with deed boundaries, accurately represented the land to be partitioned. The proper share for the 1st Defendant was confirmed based on deed 1V1, with previous transfers under deed P2 limiting Zeenath Umma’s transferable portion to 1/5. The principle reaffirmed was that partition must precisely identify the corpus and that shares must reflect valid title transfers supported by evidence. The decision relied on docum