G.D. Dinesh Indika vs President, Divisional Council, Mathugama – CA PHC 148/2005-2013

In the case between G.D. Dinesh Indika (Appellant) and the President, Divisional Council, Mathugama, and the Attorney General (Respondents), the court addressed the issue of procedural compliance regarding the payment of brief fees as mandated by Rule 13(b) of the Supreme Court in the context of proceeding with an appeal before the Court of Appeal. It was established that failure to comply with procedural requirements, namely the payment of brief fees and appearance in court, justified the dismissal of the appeal. The principle reaffirmed was that strict observance of court-mandated procedural rules is required for the proper administration and continuation of appellate proceedings. Reliance was placed on Rule 13(b) of the Supreme Court, underscoring the necessity for adherence to procedur