G.N. Weerarathne vs Municipal Council, Badulla – CA PHC 151/2006-2013
The case between G.N. Weerarathne (Appellant) and the Municipal Council, Badulla, Commissioner of the Municipal Council, Badulla, and others (Respondents), addressed the issue of whether an appeal could proceed after procedural non-compliance relating to an undeliverable court notice and non-payment of required brief fees. The court determined that failure to inform the court of an address change and failure to pay brief fees constituted valid grounds for rejection of the appeal, thereby reaffirming the principle that procedural compliance is essential for appellate proceedings. The decision relied upon procedural rules governing appellate practice, emphasizing that strict adherence to notification and fee requirements is mandatory for the maintenance of appeals.
A.W.A. Salam J. — The fi

