M. R. Malani Seneviratne vs Arauwatte Jayasoma – CA 148/1999-2013
In the case between M. R. Malani Seneviratne (Plaintiff) and Ramasinghe Jayasoma (1A Defendant-Petitioner-Appellant) with Thenuwara Acharige Karunathilaka (2nd Respondent-Respondent, substituted for deceased T.A Rathnasekera), the central legal issue concerned the entitlement to delivery and possession of lot 3 under the Partition Law following a final partition decree, and whether tenancy purportedly claimed by the respondent for a garage situated on the premises fell within statutory protection under the Rent Act and Partition Law. It was held that tenancy protection under Section 14 of the Rent Act applies exclusively to residential premises, not to business premises such as garages, reaffirming the principle that clear evidence is essential to establish statutory tenancy rights. Refere

