Omere Hemaloka Thero vs Kudagoda Hemaratne Thero – CA 933/2000-2014

In the case of Kudagoda Hemaratne Thero (Plaintiff Appellant, now deceased) and Kudagoda Gunaratne Thero (Defendant Respondent, now deceased), the court addressed whether the appeal in Civil Appeal No. CA 933/00(F) could proceed after the deaths of both principal parties and the failure of the Appellant to take substitution steps. It was held that the appeal could not continue due to the lack of due diligence on the part of the Appellant, particularly in not taking requisite actions for substitution. The principle reaffirmed was that legal proceedings require timely prosecution and compliance with procedural requirements for continuation, including substitution upon a party’s death. This decision relied on procedural rules concerning party substitution and prosecutorial diligence, undersco

REF: CA 933/2000-2014 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top