Mohommed Amza Mohommed Roshan alia Nana vs Attorney General – CA 137/2015-2016

In the case between the Attorney General (Complainant-Respondent) and Mohommed Amza Mohommed Roshan alias Nana (Accused-Appellant), the court examined the legality and appropriateness of a sentence imposed for kidnapping and grave sexual abuse under Sections 354 and 365B of the Penal Code. It was held that the statutory mandatory minimum sentence is lawful and no basis existed for reduction or suspension, reaffirming the principle that judicial discretion is limited where the legislature has prescribed mandatory sentences for serious offenses, especially those committed against minors. The decision referenced Sections 354, 365B(2)(b) of the Penal Code, Section 303(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and relevant Supreme Court precedents, underscoring that constitutional arguments for red